Seemed to work pretty well for me even on a rx 470 at 1440p on a 4k TV. Depends. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now It will be much more costly to reach the same FPS in 4K as 1440p, both in the cost of the monitor and The jump from 1440p QD-OLED to 4k QD-OLED as far as gaming goes was not as big of a jump as a IPS to QD-OLED panel for me. you can run 1440p on a 4k using upscaling, same performance as 1440p but looks a lot better and the UI is full res. So bear in mind that people might be watching your videos on a small phone screen rather than a laptop and text and buttons might be hard to see at higher resolutions. But I did want to chime in with info you might find helpful about whether or not you could expect to see a difference between 1440p and 4k on a 55" TV at ~7 feet. But my Apple TV 4k 2022 supports the 2560x1440p resolution, but I have to go into 'other formats' to select 1440p. (which get the stream directly from your geforce GPU while steam have to use other layers on top of the GPU step) So the quality on the client 4k OLED options are a plenty. But you will need at least a 1080Ti. Has anyone tried it? For a computer monitor it's gonna depend greatly on how close your are but in for my personal preference, I've owned 4k 27inch, 1440p 27 inch and 1440p 32 inch monitors and 1440p feels just fine to me sitting like 1. 1440p 60 fps + sharpening. It’s not worth it. Video, text clarity, of course improved. Monitors are good mostly in showing "native" resolutions. But it has VRR and is capable of 1440p @ 120fps. I play Warzone almost exclusively and it looked great on my 4K 60Hz TV (I set the console resolution to 4K). I'd take 4k balanced (1253p) over 1440p native too. My whole system switches to 4k on its own, but it doesn't matter what your desktop res is, the game will output 4k and the gamestream output to your tv will bypass the DSR scaling for a raw 4k image of the game. The biggest one, looking at the model in particular, would be full HDR support, which most monitors lack. Try to compare similar screen sizes from the same viewing distances. for non OLED there is the Gigabyte M28U, a 28" 4k monitor. Hell, i even use 1440p as desktop resolution because that way i can have 120Hz (on my TV 4k is limited to 60Hz). It delivers playable 4K. However, since I’m not, I think 1440p isn’t that much of a compromise as text still looks pretty crisp at 27 inches as long as you aren’t sitting super close to your monitor (<20 inches away). " In the past 8 years, Ive gone from 1080p to 1440p to 4K. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Best 4K TVs for 1440p 120Hz gaming . If your footage is 1440p, keep the rest of your pipeline at 1440p. You need a decent modern computer to run 4K with newer games. I normally play on 1440p and get around 80 fps or 60 in big cities but switch over to a 4k tv when I don't want to sit in my computer chair anymore. I am going to purchase the 5 year geek squad protection since burn in is a real risk, but I will nonetheless take steps to mitigate it. 1. For example, if you play on 800x600 on 1 sens 800 dpi, then you swap to 4K on 1 sens 800 dpi, and you move your mouse 30cm, it will move the exact same amount in game. Some are worse than others but the 1440 is stretched out to the whole 16:9 ratio instead of the 4:3 ratio. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. You can’t convince me that the processors in those 2016 TV is that much better than the 2017 Apple TV. Not so much 4K so I use my 4K tv for story based/single player games, or There's a reason 4K TVs are being sold at massive sizes. 1080p. 4 and it stopped working 1440p and got that weird 2048x1152 SDR resolution. 0, so it's limited to 60fps at 4K. But I went from 1440p 27" to a 4k 48" TV and there is a pretty massive difference in quality, you get use to it quickly and it just seems normal after awhile. 4 doesn't support 2160p/60 and my TV doesn't have DisplayPort. 1440P is a better spot for the 4070 TI in most cases. for 4k, you have Asus PG42UQ, LG C2 42", (no 32" 4k OLED at the present time). The sharpening can help make the game look sharper than it normally would be when upscaled from 1440p to 4k. If I had a 4k tv, and I connected that monitor to the tv with an hdmi cable, would the scaling make it look very blurry? I've tried playing at 1080p on my 1440p monitor and it looks almost the same as it does on my laptop. But for text and webpages it's night and day. However as games continue to push hardware boundaries over the next 5-8 years, I question how soon before the card is pushed down into the 4k less than 60FPS range. It's great having the game on one screen at 1440p and multiple windows with help pages/chat/discord up on the other at 4K. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B. Which requires HDMI 2. I don't know of any TV or movies that are in 1440p and would benefit from being played at that resolution instead of 4k Hi all! So I have A TCL C635 that i sit away from like 8 feet, I am probably soon buying a laptop that while beefy can't do 4K 60fps and i will probably stick to 1440p 60, my question is has anyone tried 1440p source material on such a TV from a similar distance? The TV will never know that the game is "1440p" if the game system upscales to 4K, and PlayStation systems don't even support 1440p output, so at no point will the TV catch a whiff of 1440p. But since 4k has a ton more pixels, I'm not sure how well the scaling would be. It's basically 2x 27" strapped together. So I got an mCable that upscales stuff to 1440p. The TV is also 120Hz, so running at 1440 allows me to run most games near 120fps keeping things super-smooth. The TV still tries to scale the image to 4K, so each original pixel doesn't match 4 new ones exactly. You'd be better off at downscaling to 1080p. Even playing at 1440p and having the TV upscale it, when you do eventually get the QD-OLED, you are gonna want something that can do 1440p @120fps at high quality settings, and depending on the games you play, those fps numbers could be really easy to hit at 1440p, or if its a new AAA Game, 120fps @1440p might be out of reach. You will see more difference between 1080p->1440p that 1440p->4k. When I hit yes it set the refresh to 60hz and seemed to really clean up the picture quality. Take my situation as example: I have a 1440p 144Hz G-Sync monitor with a GTX 1080 Ti. . Better to for a native 1440p display or to save up for the 4K 120 display. So this whole question is half experimental, but also half practical due to the fact that I could potentially get better HDR from my monitor than a If yes, a high refresh rate 1440p 27" is the best balance for gaming. My options are: Buying an "average" Samsung 55 4k TV . Pixel density and viewing distance are your key factors. I have a 6700 xt, I understand that it can run games at native 1440p without problems and at 4k fsr ultra quality. I use a LG CX 48" OLED TV as my main monitor. Anyway, my question would be if I wanted to play on the 4K display, should I set the game's resolution to 1080p, 1440p or 4k? Obviously higher res is better but I don't think my PC can handle 4k at a good enough framerate, even with DLSS and FG on, but 1440p is doable. But it's much easier to find higher refresh rates (160, 190, 240) in 1440p monitors, and this might be more important than resolution for some Heck, I do both. It’ll look good played in a 1440p monitor or a 65” 4k. 1, which does monitor does not have. If you can afford it, the golden gaming setup would be a 5120x1440 OLED 240hz for PC games/shooters, and a regular 120hz 4K OLED/TV for console and 3rd-person titles/couch gaming. With that being said, if you don’t have at least a 3080, you need to stick to 1440p. On a 4k TV, it would internally render at 1440p and upscale to 4k. Best combos of performance and value. I’d rather play with everything maxed and smooth high frames than a resolution bump that’s barely noticeable unless you play on a huge monitor sitting very close. The Fire TV Stick only knows 1080p OR 4K but nothing in-between. It was depressing because I might as well just use the steam deck in such a situation. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K If you want a 1440p 120 native display then buy one. (Xbox One X) - Will 1440p work on a 4k TV? Or does it only work on 1440p monitors? Would like to just game on 1440p for a smoother gameplay & higher fps rather than being limited to 30fps on 4k mode. Reply reply. 1080p would be fine since the pixels downscale 4-1 with no overlap color approximation. I've tried the demo on a 1440p monitor and a 4k oled TV. 27 inch 1440p or 4k also good option. Hello , I've recently bought a new gaming pc with a 3060ti / I5 -12400F / 16GB ram and can't really afford a new monitor for now . It probably looked better on the 4k, but honestly for me, the 1440p monitor still looked very good and not too different. I have a 980 Ti and play at 1440p and have tried it on a 58" 4K TV. If I try to change the resolution to 1440p on my TV it forces me out of full-screen mode and puts the game as a window in the corner. I’m from the opposite side of the spectrum i switched my xbox setup from a 43” tv to a desk setup with a 1440p 32” monitor for context im 41 years old and wear trifocals everyone’s needs are different so yes you are very right not everyone’s eyes are good enough to really even tell the difference between 1440 and 4k 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. But I've heard that playing games at down-scaled resolution on high res monitor is worse than on native-low resolution. also at 4K you will be GPU bottlenecked, so getting a 7800X3D won't help your fps much. As far as I know it can take 4k 60Hz and downscale it to 1440p 60Hz, and it can take 1080p 120Hz and upscale it to 1440p 120Hz. And there's 144Hz 4K monitors coming later this year, but not even a 1080Ti can drive 4K at 100FPS. I Play at 1440p 120FPS on my LG C9 OLED 4K 1200Hz tv because I refuse to be scalped for a new GPU. But this is by far the nicest TV I've owned, before this I got a 400$ samsung 4k tv and before that just had 100$ TV's off craigslist. Alot of people like 1440p at 32 inch. Works beautifully! Go to NVidia display pane, set 1440p and whatever Hz your tv can handle and limit the FPS 2 FPS below that limit if you use G-sync. Some 1440p monitors like mine (Asus VG32VQ) can take a 4K signal. However, at the distance I am from the screen (6ish ft) there is no noticeable difference between 1440 and 2160. Works the same way downscaling a 1440p monitor to 720p. Best of both worlds. I have a 27" 1440p 144 Hz TN monitor. I'm glad to have upgraded both my monitor and my TV to 4K144/4K120 and I find the performance penalties to be worth the trade off in the much improved image quality. 4K looks great. I had no idea gaming monitors could be this good. I recently went to a 3 display setup and I love it I have a 24" 1080p 60 Hz IPS monitor. Get a 4k 60Hz monitor or TV. You have to have a beefy PC to be able to actually play games in 4k. You can probably push most games to 100+ FPS without upscaling at 1440P for now, and with upscaling hit even faster, and future games will just require quality DLSS 3 upscaling without frame generation. But for some reason other than the 720 and 1080 resolutions, the image is stretched. But 4K-1440p is not as clean a transition. With moonlight, you can force the resolution you want so that you are certain that the stream will be at 4k resolution. If I was doing just coding, I’d get the 4k panels instead. for 1440p you have the new LG 27GR95QE, and the upcoming Asus variant. There is far less pixel crawl on objects like wires and characters in the distance. While VR enthusiasts want nothing less than 16K per eye, most people find 4K TV or 1440p desktop resolution perfect. I am specifically wondering if the Xbox Series S (which is max 1440p, and can be scaled up to 4k) would look substantially different than the Xbox Series X (Which is max 4K, and can be scaled up to 8k). However, 1440p doesn't scale well on a 4k display, while 1080p will. It does this with only a marginal increase in cost. My problem is that the mCable does not see these TVs as 1440p compatible (my capture card is at least seen by the mCable as 1440p capable). (Movies and TV shows are released at either 1080p or 2160p, aka 4K. Any idea on what the issue could be? I have the Apple TV set to 4k along with HDR and match content range set to on. If you run a 4K TV at 2K (2560x1440) it cuts the refresh rate in half. If I run it at 1440p with no scaling it gives me a ~31. I've found 4K is much better for text and tables and web pages, but 1440p is definitely plenty for gaming. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I have friends who play in a range of 1080 to 4k. 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. I believe that If the game you try to play does not directly start at 4k, Nvidia app will consider it cannot run at 4k and will configure the stream at 1080p. I have my PC running through my 4k TV. I have a 27" 144hz 1440p monitor for multiplayer games and ran an hdmi to my 4k OLED TV for those single player couch gaming moments. But 1440p 120Hz from 4K it So at about 120 pixels per degree, or 4x diagonal for 1080p, 2. they die very soon . Excuse me if I'm miss-wording this, but I have a 4k 6-series TCL 55" TV. Hey all, Was lucky enough to score a 3080Ti recently and am trying to decide between a 4k 144Hz monitor or a 1440p 240Hz monitor. It has a bit of overhead so 4k dlss quality will run a bit worse for framerate than just 1440 native but it'll look better. If your monitor can accept only 1440p or lower you will get the Apple TV outputting in 1080p, then everything will be in 1080p. My current monitor/tv set up is a 1440p Asus IPS 165hz monitor, and the LG C2 32 inch 4K tv 120Hz. 6x for 4k. If you don't do any work on the computer or even browsing the web or reddit, then it's probably safe to say the difference is very small. For programming, assuming you can use only one monitor, best monitor in my view is Dell U2520D, a 25 inch 1440p. I don't think any game can run 120fps, possibly a Ps5 pro will have that power and i've seen some videos showing that the 4k may have ghosting effect, if you choose a higher hz say 120hz you may notice interpolation, stuttering juddering and screen tearing even on movies so personally i'd stick with a 4K 60fps TV with a good hdmi 2. As far as brightness it's fully adjustable so not sure what you mean about that. Any resolution in between would be 30hz. I feel that at this small size it looks pretty much the same as 4K for gaming, namely that due to everything being smaller it's harder to see all the tiny details so those being lost vs 4K is less of an issue and the performance improvement is significant. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k I have my PC hooked up to my 4K TV. I agree, if the games have dlss, use that to scale it up to 4k. If you take for granted that 4K --> 1440p scaling looks great (which not everyone seems to), and you can afford a 4K@144Hz monitor, then it's reasonable to just go for that instead of a 1440p@144Hz. The chip in the steamlink isn't powerful enough to decode the stream. Don't skimp and get one of the lesser 60hz screens though, you absolutely want something like the LG C1/C2, Gigabyte FO48U, or Alienware QD-OLED with 120hz+. TV’s have really good built in upscalers, pkus the Xbox will do some work as well. The Xbox offered to display in 4K, which I thought was odd since it's a 1440p monitor. I’m saying the image, upscaled on the monitor from 1080p to 1440p without any processing, looks fuzzy with obvious aliasing With this device much of that goes away and it appears much more crisp, as if the device itself is capable of putting out a proper 1440p image and the images and textures themselves are in that resolution instead of being “zoomed in” on as without the device. Jul 30, 2024 · Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. get reddit premium. The description probably gave it away already if you've kept up with monitor news since it seems to be the first of it's kind, but I'm referring to the LG 27GR95QE-B. 1440 to 4K has diminishing return in game image quality and increases cost yet again. In Ultrawide, you have AW3423DW/F and Samsung G85SB. It runs 4k on mostly Max settings just fine in AAA titles if you run dlss. LazyGit. It has the same PPI as 1080p on 24 inch, which is fine and does not look distorted. Is it best just to set the in game resolution to 1440p and then let the TV do the rest of the work? Aug 3, 2023 · You'll see in the table below that a 1080p and 1440p resolution represents the vertical pixels of the display, but 4k represents the horizontal pixels of the display (even though a 4k monitor actually has less than 4,000 horizontal pixels), so the common names of these resolutions don't all relate to the same thing. edit: Im going to go for the 1440p monitor, sorry for not responding to all replies I am at school. fortunately I had them insured so got my money back . If you try 1440p, it will look basically the same as 1080p except a lot more pc power. However, the YouTube TV app is only showing 1440p as the maximum resolution while I am currently watching both the USFL and MCI vs Aston Villa soccer game. upscaling was made to optimize running lower resolutions on a monitor, it intelligently scales up to the monitor res whereas running a lower resolution as a whole uses simple scaling The difference between 1440p and 4K isn’t nearly as big as the GPU power required to play 4K at Ultra. Resolution. The biggest contributing factors to whether 4K or 1440p looks better is screen size and your distance from the screen. TV scales whatever signal you send. 2 it worked 1440p in OS perfectly fine (not sure about streaming resolution). Bottom line. Screenshots are then Upscaled without Interpolation to 8K (7680x4320), as that is a common resultion where each Screenshot can get scaled up into (1080p -> 16x, 1440p -> 9x, 4K -> 4x), without adding artifacts or losing Pixels. At that point, paired with varifocal lenses and other comfort tech, is when I think multi-display XR offices (and a lot of other VR/AR/XR applications) provide I have that one. 1440p unprocessed will still look great on a 4K TV without upscaling, though. You can always play at 1440p or even 1080p on the 4k screen if the games are too hard to run. I'd call it an entry level 4K card. Smart TVs are notorious for using under powered chips. I have a 4k Tv at home , tried all possible setting with Game like MSFS2020 Call of duty Warzone Battlefield 1 And here my conclusion 1080p 120+ was smooth with minimal Input lag but on 4k tv the Pixels were visible ( in call of duty Warzone) In 1440p pixels were not that much of issue and I couldn't tell any difference between 1080p and 1440. However in general, games don't upscale so well on monitors compared to TV's . The jump from 1080p to 1440p was eye opening. ) 1440p is a real-time rendering res for games (usually PC), as a compromise between the performance of 1080p and the sharpness of 4K. It supports Dolby Vision, native 4K and also supports ultrawide mode and can be used with my ps5 and Apple TV 4K in addition to my Gaming PC. From official mClassic FAQ: "mClassic is Technicolor Color Certified for 4K upscaling all movies and TV shows from HD to 4K which have a frame rate of 24Hz. I really only want 1440p on a smaller frame for FPSs. Yes pixels will be smaller using 4K/UHD at 32 inch but most people won't be able to run games at 100+ fps at this res. Bottom line - it's fine, depending on distance, for 1080p, but 1440p looks perfectly OK at 40". I’m a day trader so need a lot of screen space, a monitor of this size gives me the surface area that I need. I wound up buying a smaller 1080p monitor (so similar pixel-per-inch) that I knew had really good pixel response time / motion clarity and colours and I am so much happier with Next-gen mass-market VR resolution seems to be 2K resolution per eye (Meta Cambria and PSVR2). On a 4k tv, you want to game in either 1080p or 4k. I've seen some people claim that enabling DSR and setting the Shield to stream at 4K will give you a native 4K experience. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. 1440p can look good scaled to 4K, but I don't think GPUs do a very good job of it at the moment. But then you go back to 1440p and realise how much blurrier it is. I wanted add that I find it hard to believe that power is really the issue when some smart TVs from 2016 are being update for YTTV 4K. If the TV has good 1440 to 4k upscaling, maybe it doesn't matter much. Setting moonlight to 4k on the shield when running a 1440p monitor can sometimes result in glitches with the scaling when steam or EPIC does a pop up resulting in the stream being cropped. Anywho, I was originally thinking of getting a 4k 32 inch monitor, but recently saw a new 1440p 27 inch OLED monitor announced and releasing soon. Desktop resolution in Win10 is set to 2560x1440 (highest PC mode in nvidia control panel that allows me 120hz with my GTX1070) and gaming resolution is also set at 1440p as 4k would be near impossible with I had ATV 4k (1st gen), with factory tvOS 14. So the older apple tv 4k (pre 2021) doesn't seem to support 1440p. 4K feels like bigger jump in sharpness than with watching TV or playing games. I imagine it's downscaling, but it shows as 4K on the actual monitor settings, so I'm a little confused? I have a 1440p monitor but a 4k TV I want to stream games to from time to time. 78 times the pixels at 1440p compared to 1080p 1440p - > 4k = 2. CPUs and GPUs are just barely hitting a point where they can comfortably run even passive content at 2160P, much less interactive content at that resolution. A lot of 4k tvs look really bad when moving fast (motion blur type stuff) in video games you really need a good TV to fully take advantage for gaming (which is super expensive) and a lot of rigs cant run games above 60 fps 4k even if they spent a ridiculous amount of money on the tv. I’ve been using a Razer Blade for the past few years with a 1080p 240Hz monitor, so both options would be a resolution upgrade but one would be a refresh rate downgrade (although the difference between 144 and 240 Hz might not amount to much). Close up, a 1080p game on a 4k monitor will still look blurry, because it's being upscaled with fairly basic technology, so it's really a game of trade offs. So I’ve decided to stick with 1440p. Gaming at 1440p on 4K monitor is bad ? I consider buying UHD monitor (Dell or Samsung) because I'm a big fan of watching 4K videos and movies. true. If No G-sync, then that doesn't matter. 960p texture definitely more crisp, but unless you're super nitpick about the details you won't easy notice the differences. The upgrade going from 1440p to 4K is more noticeable than 1080p to 1440p. No existen las TV de 40" o mas que tengan como maximo la resolucion 2k o 1440p, esto es porque para contenido multimedia es decir, PELICULAS, SERIES y CABLE DE PAGA, no existe contenido en 1440p porque dicha resolucion nunca fue un exito dado que se opaco por el BOOM del 4k. But again nobody would consider 1440p over 4k if they actually watched TV and movies. Some monitors can downsample 4k to 1440p. the cheap 4k tvs today are a joke . I can definitely tell the difference between 1080 and 1440. I have a 43" 4K 60 Hz TV that I mounted above these two monitors. 1 port if u Sometimes (especially at most airbnb's and hotels) the TV's available are pretty crap. If you followed the pre-setup the 4k x 2k, 3840 x 2160 resolution should already be selected. The Alienware is a one trick pony and it has an anti reflective coating which in general makes images look fuzzier. Make sure your GPU can handle the jump. Since 4K is exactly 4x the resolution of 1080p, a 60hz 4K TV runs both 1080p and 4K at 60hz. So I ended up gaming at 1080p60 on it. Games look exactly how they normally would playing in 1080p on a 4K monitor because they have a similar scale factor. The official Nvidia application always choose between 1080p and 4k. Obviously using DLSS, a 4k monitor is perfectly fine for a 4080 but I wouldn't feel bad about 1440p. The issue with 1440 is there are like no large screens Nah 1440p is great with a 4080. Going down to 1440 doesn't exactly work since the pixels don't line up properly. If it does support 4K input the stick will stream 4K but the monitor will downscale it, the monitor will not upscale your 1080p input, it's just gonna be 1080p which will look worse on Now it's likely still being scaled up to 4k before output (because the HUD is 4k) , but can now be downscaled to 1440p for output to a 1440p screen, whereas before, if you were using a PS5 on a 1440p screen, you had to set the PS5 to output at 1080p and let the screen scale that up. After my old 1080p TV got broken, I bought a discounted 4k TV (Samsung QN90B 50inch) to watch movies and be used 50% of the time as a pc monitor for gaming, web surfing, etc. Average TVs have around 40-60 ms input lag anyway, so adding image processing will make it go near that point where it's unplayable. cheap 4k tvs are useless. monitors on the other hand hand have much greater life bought many tv and monitors over the year . Moonlight is meant to be an open source alternative to the shield software to be used as a client of the geforce experience stream fonctionality. Basically the higher the resolution, the easier time you’ll have finding people at long distances. Because there's not a whole number scale factor between 1440p and 4K, the images will look slightly more blurry than if you were playing on a native 1440p monitor. So a 55" 1080p TV and a 55" 4K TV displaying the same 1080p signal will still look different. I have a rtx 3080 gpu which is great at 1440p for anything multiplayer focused/competitive. I'll be playing on the monitor so my wife doesn't get spoiled since her PC is in the TV room. Imo for a TV 4k is the practical upper limit for resolution, for monitors, we can still go higher, but will again hit a practical upper limit somewhere between 8 and 16k, because at that point you can fill a big enough fov to start turning your head I have a 4K Apple TV with 4K HDR set to on on my Samsung Q80R. The 4070 ti is not really good enough for high refresh 4k at really high settings, not you will not need to change monitor in at least We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I can't speak to those exact dimensions. So will the Xbox Series X always default to 4K or will I be able to force it to output at 1440p so I can get those sweet frames? Just built my first PC recently and wondering if anyone has any suggestions for gaming at 1440p on a 4k OLED TV (C2)? It seems like there are multiple ways to go about it and it's a bit overwhelming. I recently bought a Samsung G5 monitor (1440p 144Hz) and was surprised to see the game looked horrible, mostly due to heavy aliasing. The image will look slightly worse than a native 4k image, but the HDR support will push it well over your 1080p monitor's quality, assuming you play games that support it. Personally, I jumped in the super ultra wide path with a 1440p 49" G9 OLED. So it sounds like most PC gamers think watching TV and movies isn't worth it. If you have a HDR 4K TV, see Note And finally, even in 2024 4K is still demanding on your PC. My TV (Samsung 55RU8000) has HDMI 2. 1080p is UI scaling. For it to be able to take 4K 120Hz and downscale it 1440p 120Hz it would have accept 4k 120Hz in the first place. It doesn't look bad, mind you, just not identical. I had a 4080 and a 4k monitor and I almost wish I had a 1440p monitor when trying to max out some games with Ray Tracing. I don't run 4K since the 290X GPU's HDMI 1. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. The only thing to consider with 1440p vs. 1440p definitely look better, but since i don't own 4K screen i can't state how far the difference. In my opinion, totally worth it. I started with a GTX 970, which was a 1080p champ. Budget should not be an issue, however the 1440p monitor would most likely be 240hz whilst the 4k monitor would he 144hz. "duplicate display on 1 and 2") or 4k (i. Chances are that yours does not, it's simply something you have to try. Personally, I use a 1440/165hz monitor for my Series S and X. They're about the same price but the image quality on the monitor is just magnitudes above the tv's. Contrast is ok. With that being said, at a glance, as you increase in resolution, there should be diminishing returns, but 4K is pretty great and 8K will probably be the ideal resolution for VR, but that's just a guess, again based on pixel density and viewing distance, though this For me it's making more sense to go 1440 because the difference vs 4k is supposedly negligible at a 2-3 foot distance, 1440p 144hz pc gaming is more accessible and cheaper that 4k 144hz both in monitor and gpu, and even if you wanted to go 4k 144hz for your ps5, you'd have to wait and spend even more money on brand spanking new hdmi 2. La resolucion de 1440p solo la usan los Smartphones de gama alta y se Apr 25, 2024 · PCs are fine for content too. Depending on your preferences in FPS and upscaling methods, there is a big difference between 1440p and 2160p. It looks good on either Ive played with both 4k/60hz and 4k/120hz TV and honestly i didn't realize any difference (im a casual gamer) plus most of the game only do 60hz now except for some 1st person shooter game. I have a much easier time seeing people over 100 meters then my friends in 1080p, and a much easier time seeing people over 150m then my 1440p buddies. 1440p 120Hz is a nice middle ground as you've identified, but native 1080p would look better than blurry upscaled 1080p, especially for crisp elements like a HUD in a game. You say your rig can run 4k. Games can use all sorts of weird resolution, and quite a few modern games use dynamic resolution scaling. Discussion I'm looking for a TV to act as my PC monitor. Basically becouse pixel density, on a 24" or 27" monitor there is not much difference between 2k and 4k, the larger the monitor or TV the more noticable the differece But on my big living room tv I prefer my ps5 to be on my 4k oled for the exclusives, And occasional multiplat I don't play on PC (elden ring). Imo, get a tv which supports 1440p and 4k, for the games that are tough to run, set windows to 1440p and the tv will upscale it. 8m away I couldn't even tell the difference between 1080p or 4k, even up close the TV did a good enough upscaling job that there weren't any articating around text even at 1440p that doesn't match 4k so good as 1080p does. I don't have experience gaming on TVs. Although the game runs at 1440p, the PS5 is only able to actually display games at 1080p or 4k. Only 1080p looks visibly fuzzier, but then again my face is a mere 2/3 feet from the screen. Aug 31, 2018 · I usually game at 1440p, or 2560x1080, only 4K on old games (my 1060 can't push that much). Even my 1080p LG TV (47") looks great at a 2-3m distance. 4K Without HDR. So if you're used to good TVs YMMV. It's overkill for 1440p, but it won't blow you away with super high fps in 4K either. (Again, using both at 32"). So I’m interesting in buying a new tv for Black Friday and am wondering about the trade offs between getting a tv that has multiple input resolutions with 120 hz refresh rate compared to one that is only 4K @ 60 hz. I've had a lot of success doing this with lg oleds. So I've seen some variations of this question, but I haven't seen an asnwer to this specifically. I play in 4k. It looks great. And it's great. 6x for 1440p and 1. 24 votes, 94 comments. I bought a new one but haven't tested it yet, but chroma sub sampling was an issue that caused text to be irritating. If you want to game in 1440p, get a 1440p monitor. Then I updated it to tvOS 14. Plus ps5 won't ever be pushing out newer games that can do 4k 144hz, hell probably won't be many 4k 60hz moving forward if they get better and better looking. 25 times the pixels at 4k compared to 1440p I can definitely agree that going from 1080p to 1440p is a world of difference. Dual 27 inch 1440p is the setup I rock for gaming and coding. 5" screen. As far as the choice between 1440p and 4K OLED, you should only go with the 1440p if you're unwilling to commit to the $1100 or so, and the space needed, to put a 42-48" screen on your desk. Edit: I forgot to mention the 4k part of the tv only works with certain programs/games/tv shows, if you want to display 4k content via a pc to your tv then your desktop resolution would have to be 4k, if it can support it if not then all the content will be in 1080p. I have a 4k 60 inch TV mounted on the wall (the imput lag is somewhat tolerable but I don't think it have some special upscaling chip like some other tv do ) and was wondering how to play on lower resolutions 2k/1080p in a way that wouldn't look too bad . Last time there was a 4K TV but it only ran that at 30hz. The horizontal width is more important for multitasking as vertical height is normally scrollable. 5 years of use. Just going from 60 Hz to 144 Hz is such a massive game changer on its own! I was using a 1440p monitor for a while, but it did not have good motion clarity at all, lots of ghosting, and the colours were not good either. Many PS5 games like TLOU2 run at 1440p yet look good on a 4K TV because there is enough resolution for a basic upscale to look good. For videos and games, the difference between 1080p and 1440p is genuinely quite subtle, which explains why you can't really tell the difference. Sources that are higher than 30Hz (such as video games) can still be upscaled to 2K/QHD/1440p resolution. A better move for the gaming experience is from 1440P to 1440P Ultrawide as the extra side spacing helps with game view and element placement. upscaling is superior to running the whole thing at a lower res. "extend desktop to this display") for watching movies in VLC? If image interpolation is used for upscaling then 1440p to 4K will look better than 1080p to 4K because there is significantly more input information. What you need it for might change which is best for you, in other words. OLED_Gaming join 1440p monitor with high refresh rate . 0 adapter when they become available but until then I have to stick with sub-4K if I want more than 30 FPS. This is honestly what I'm wondering. It's based on hardware limitation. When you take a 4k monitor and downscale to 1080p, you're essentially taking 4 pixels in a square and making 1 larger pixel out of the 4. I might be wrong, but I feel like that shouldn't be the case. HDMI Cable from 1440p PC to 4k TV; does it matter whether the desktop resolution is 1440p (i. I do not plan to play competitive games, my question is more focused on games like God of war. 1440p looks very good. I’d be using the tv for both normal viewing (movies/tv) but also gaming with my pc and gtx 1070. If I wanted 4k, I'd be going for a TV that I'm sat well back from. You cannot play 4k on the 1440p screen if the game is too easy to run. TV's have good upscaling AI tech because most TV shows still aren't HD, so they have to look good upscaled in these massive size displays we have today. So I have looked online for some workaround to be able to get a 4k stream on moonlight although games and/or windows won't let me select a 4k resolution option with a 1440p monitor. The difference from 1440p to 4k is quite big. 1920x1080. I have a 4K HDR TV, but it has zero certifications whereas the G7 has VESA DisplayHDR 600 certification so while it's not ideal it's actually better than my 4K TV in terms of HDR certification. When it comes to 4K, you want as big as possible or the PPI is high as can be. If you're on the "60FPS is good enough" camp, then yeah, 4K will probably make sense. This comes down to your visual angle of resolution which determines how small of an object you can see at a given distance (the average human has a visual angle of resolution of No I’m saying if you switch resolutions, the in game feeing will be the exact same if you keep the dpi and sens the same. Best combo of performance and value. Will it give me 4k, 1080p or is 1440p signal possible Apple TV doesn't support 1440p It means 1440p content displayed on a 4k native screen will look noticeably worse than if it were displayed on a 1440p native screen. 1440p/144Hz > 4k/60Hz I prefer, by far, 1440p high refresh rate than 4k and barely getting 60fps. The 3080 is good enough to handle 4k today so my conclusion is yes, if you want to upgrade 4k is definitely the right choice instead of for example 240hz 1440p, unless you mostly play competitive fps titles, that or maybe ultrawide 1440p like the aw3423dw but ultrawide comes with its own set of quirks like not every game having full support for I always play games at 1440p on my 3 years old 55" Samsung RU8000. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. For other games, I’d use full screen 4K. This is the same when going from 1440p to 4k on ultra… absolutely amazing to see. it would only really help if you were going for super high framerates at lower resolutions. Most TVs that say they’re 120hz or 240hz are actually 60hz. but can it really tho? I have a 4K TV so when using the RT5X I want to output at the highest resolution possible. You'll be fine with a 4k TV. Whether I’m playing Series S on my 1080p monitor or 4k Sony. The max it would support was 2048x1152. They fake this by blending frames together to create additional frames in between. However you would have to look at your usecase before considering one of those. This makes me question if getting a 1440p may be a better move as I doubt the card will see 1440p as a challenge before it's end of life. The smoothness of 360hz vs 240hz was apparent to me 360hz was noticably smoother, although 240hz is still great. Not only now, but for the next couple of years too. Of course, 4k is clearer, but I have no problem with 1440p. I For the longest time I was using a GTX 1050Ti with my LG C1 OLED 55", no issues with 1080p at all from about 1. It looks good at 1440p to me, markedly better than 1080p. And I am 1 meter away. Maybe i got somethings wrong but the part "jump from 1440p to 4k is less than 1080p to 1440p" arent correct, at least not if we use pixelcount 1080p - > 1440p = 1. I bought 2 4k tvs. If your 4K TV does not have HDR, before you can create a custom resolution you need to set your refresh rate to 30 Hz from the dropdown on the right hand side of the screen and click Apply to save it. Hi all, I’m currently debating on purchasing either a 1440p OLED, or 4K OLED. Aug 31, 2018. I will buy a Displayport to HDMI 2. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. If that is not an option in a game, resolution scaling in-game is also better as the UI will be 4k. The tv is a Vizio 70" 4K 60hz HDR, the monitor is an Asus ROG Swift curved ultrawide 1440p 100hz G-sync. But at the same time I wonder if it would be worth experiencing 4k gaming. It's not perfect but it's pretty good. I like the TV for the big screen couch experience. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B I bought a 4k 144hz monitor (previously using 1440p 144hz) with a GTX 1080 and noticed blue/red fuzzy text which hurt to read, and realized it was my DP cable. Hello gamers. I of course run the monitor at its native 1440p resolution. But I wouldn’t buy a 4K tv to play at 1440p. they died just after 1. For comparison, i have 1080p native, using internal res 720p vs 960p. but monitors always had much greater life. If I keep it at 4k it tanks my fps down to about 40. e. the difference in resolution between 4K and 1440p is not as visible as what people often say. I also have 3 Samsung 4K TVs that I connect to a PC and can set them to 1440p resolution @ 30 and 60 hz. my monitors on Welcome to the un official Diablo 4 subreddit! The place to discuss news, streams, drops, builds and all things Diablo 4. 5- 2 feet away from the screen. 4K, UDH, and all the other resolutions above 1440 are just marketing garbage used to sell substandard quality TVs. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 1440 on ultra settings almost looks like 4k. I sit further back enough to where I have about the same fov that I do with 27inch. From character builds, skills to lore and theories, we have it all covered. xgjqk tmilp mocf bvozm twebvfs gokulnxo wkocj ykrqkz ugxbb qngw
Copyright © 2022